Leaders Must Communicate with Clarity
by Steve Adubato, Ph.D. |
|
|
We’ve talked about how common it is for the message you
send not to be the one that is received. In fact, miscommunication
like this is a lot more common than being understood as you intended.
Consider the case of former Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
Administrator Christie Whitman, who testified this past week before
Congress regarding her leadership and communication surrounding
9/11 and the air quality at Ground Zero. Much has been written and
said about the fact that the EPA communicated that the air was “safe”
in New York and that rescue workers on “the pile” had
no reason to fear. Christie Whitman this week once again insisted
that’s not what she said six years ago and argued that she
made every attempt then to communicate as clearly as possible that
rescue workers needed to wear respirators to protect themselves.
Consider this September 18, 2001 statement made by Whitman on official
EPA stationary saying; “I am glad to reassure the people of
New York and Washington D.C. that their air is safe to breathe.”
After the fact, Whitman said that she was only referring to the
general public in New York and not rescue workers. Whitman insisted
that her communication was clear and that there was a distinction
being made between the air quality in Manhattan versus that at Ground
Zero. Many, including rescue workers who are suffering serious respiratory
ailments that they believe were a direct result of the toxic air
quality at Ground Zero, shouted during Whitman’s Congressional
testimony; “Whitman lied—people died!”
I’m not convinced that Christie Whitman lied, but her communication
was confusing and contradictory. Some questions to consider.
Q—How could Christie Whitman or any leader,
particularly in such a difficult and emotional time after 9/11,
be sure that people received the message exactly as they intended?
A—You can never be sure, but great leaders
do everything humanly possible to break down communication barriers
and clarify confusion. They must follow up and be assertive. They
must say what the consequences of ignoring an official directive
are. The EPA may have documents in their files saying that there
was some distinction between the scientific testing of the air quality
in Manhattan versus that at Ground Zero, but that is more about
covering one’s back. I’m talking about leaders communicating
in a definitive and uncompromising manner.
Q—But even if Christie Whitman had said
that the air quality at Ground Zero wasn’t safe, wouldn’t
rescue workers still have insisted on doing that heroic job?
A—Probably, but that is not the point. A
great leader, even under the most difficult of circumstances, sometimes
has to protect people from themselves and their own emotions. A
leader must step back and look at the situation objectively and
realize that people may be putting themselves at risk and must do
everything humanly possible must be done to stop that—even
if you become the target of ridicule and criticism.
Q—Assume that you are correct about Christie
Whitman. What could she do now to rectify the situation?
A—You can’t rewrite history. You can’t
take back your public communication, particularly in the critical
days after 9/11. But what Whitman could do is take responsibility
for what happened and say that she can understand people being confused
about her public statements regarding the air quality in Manhattan
being “safe” versus at Ground Zero. Instead, Whitman
appears to be shifting blame and got particularly angry and agitated
with people implying that she “lied” about the air quality.
Being indignant about defending yourself in the face of tremendous
evidence that you probably made a significant error in the way you
communicated in a stressful situation is a questionable strategy
indeed.
Dr. Steve Adubato coaches and speaks on the subjects of communication
and leadership and is the author of the book "Speak from the Heart."
Write to him at The Star-Ledger, 1 Star-Ledger Plaza, Newark, NJ
07102, or click here
to contact him through this web site.
|