James Frey's Failures Provide Lessons for Us by Steve Adubato, Ph.D. |
|
|
We’ve had a week or so to look back and get some perspective
on one of the biggest media / crisis communication television events
in recent years. That’s right, the Oprah / James Frey confrontation
over the author’s lies and half-truths in his best-selling
book, “A Million Little Pieces.”
To date, much of the analysis has been about Oprah, her performance
and her motives. Yet, there are many communication lessons the rest
of us (who may face tough questioning in work-related situations)
can learn from James Frey’s performance.
Q—What was James Frey’s biggest communication
mistake in the Oprah interview?
A—There were so many. The biggest was that
he went into the interview without a coherent and credible message.
He had no game plan. Without a message that you believe in, you’re
in big trouble. Your message is your anchor. It is what you hold
on to and fall back on when the questioning gets really tough. Sure,
you answer the question, but you always go back to your message.
Yet, Frey never developed one, which is hard to believe since the
stakes were so high. Consider this message; “I’m ashamed
of what I did. There is no excuse. I take full responsibility for
being dishonest with you, Oprah, and your audience. I apologize
to all the people who believed in me and my book, believing it to
be true. I can’t go backwards, but I can do everything possible
from here on to try to make up for this terrible mistake.”
Q—But would such a message really have made
a difference with Oprah, who was clearly committed to embarrassing
Frey on the air?
A—Mike Wallace once said, there are no embarrassing
questions, there are only embarrassing answers. What made Oprah’s
questions in the interview so bad for Frey was the way he responded.
In crisis communication, it is not about winning or losing. For
Frey or others in trouble, it is clear you are going to lose. The
question is, how badly are you going to lose. Frey lost so big,
largely because of the way he communicated, not because of what
Oprah asked him.
Q—Beyond having a strong message and apologizing,
how could Frey have really prepared for Oprah?
A—When communicating under pressure, it
is critical that you identify the three or four toughest questions
you are likely to be asked. (“James, why did you lie about
the length of time you were in jail?”) Your goal is to identify
these questions and then practice answering them BEFORE you face
them for real. Oprah’s questions were not surprising. They
were the predictable, yet Frey seemed stunned and confused when
confronted with them. When you haven’t practiced how you are
going to respond to tough questions you are likely to be asked,
you have no business showing up for the actual event. (This is also
true in meetings, sales presentations or other business scenarios.)
Q—How much did Frey’s communication
style impact on public reaction?
A—A lot. Frey’s communication was
halting, defensive, confusing and weak. At times, you couldn’t
even hear what he was saying, because he was almost mumbling. He
was also not proactive in his communication. (“Oprah, one
important point I want to touch on is…”) Proactive communication
is about not simply responding to a question as if Oprah was the
prosecutor and you were on the witness stand. It means seizing the
opportunity to communicate important points, whether you are asked
about these things or not. Frey did none of this and was at the
Oprah’s mercy, which is not a good place to be when the queen
of daytime TV is angry at you for “betraying” her.
Dr. Steve Adubato coaches and speaks on the subjects of communication
and leadership and is the author of the book "Speak from the Heart."
Write to him at The Star-Ledger, 1 Star-Ledger Plaza, Newark, NJ
07102, or click here
to contact him through this web site. |