Meeting Mania Must End by Steve Adubato, Ph.D. |
|
|
In his book, “Death by Meeting,” best selling author
Patrick Lencioni quotes a mythical corporate manager saying, “If
I didn’t have to go to meetings, I’d like my job a lot
more.” Lencioni goes on to write about professionals lamenting
how much they hate meetings. Lencioni asks, if we hate meetings
so much why don’t we work harder to make them better. It’s
a great question.
Meetings should be the place where most of the communicating and
decision making in business takes place. If your meetings are bad,
there is a safe bet your business isn’t doing well. But it
doesn’t have to be this way.
Q—So why are so many meetings so bad?
A—Biggest reason? Either no agenda or a
topic-oriented agenda that doesn’t focus on accomplishing
concrete goals. When you have a meeting without an agenda it meanders
all over the place. Decisions aren’t made. Deadlines aren’t
set. The topic-oriented agenda simply lists a bunch of things to
talk about. For example, “Budget” or “Fundraising.”
The problem with listing topics in your agenda is that it isn’t
clear what must be accomplished. Rather, go with a GOAL ORIENTED
agenda that looks like this; “Ideas for cutting the budget
5% by December 31,” or, “Top 10 fundraising prospects
to be contacted by the end of the month.” The focus is on
action and results.
Q—But aren’t meetings, even with a
bad agenda, good to have because they bring people together?
A—Absolutely not. Meeting just to meet is
a terrible idea. Don’t meet to shoot the breeze. Don’t
meet because you think you should. And leaders shouldn’t call
meetings just to hear themselves talk. One of the biggest problems
with meetings is that we have too many of them, which causes the
ones that are REALLY important not to be appreciated for what they
are.
Q—But if we don’t meet, how can we
address our issues?
A—Try sharing information electronically.
If your meetings consist of people giving “informational reports”
not followed by an interactive discussion, save the time and have
them send an e-mail. What about walking down the hall and talking
directly to the person you need to talk to instead of getting everyone
else involved in a meeting? And don’t forget the phone, which
is great to make quick decisions. Unnecessary meetings cost billions
to businesses.
Q—What are some other things we can do to
improve our meetings?
A—Make sure there is a clock on the wall
and use it. Allot a specific amount of time for an agenda item and
keep to it. Put it in writing. Next, as a meeting leader, make sure
you get participants to contribute instead of you doing all the
talking. Ask probing questions like, “Jim, what specific action
do you think we need to take in order to overcome this obstacle?”
Raise the bar for Jim and every meeting participant so they know
their input is valuable. The more people see meetings as a place
where they can contribute and things will get done, the more they
will invest in them.
Also, put deadlines on actions to be taken. Meeting leaders must
create a sense of urgency; “We MUST do XYZ, by the end of
the week.” Meeting leaders must also clarify any potential
confusion or misunderstanding; “So what you are saying Joan
is…” Finally, don’t end a meeting without recapping
significant decisions that have been made.
What questions about meetings do you have and/or what meeting advice
can you offer? Write to me at sadubato@aol.com
or call at (973) 744-5260 so we can all share and learn.
Dr. Steve Adubato coaches and speaks on the subjects of communication
and leadership and is the author of the book "Speak from the Heart."
Write to him at The Star-Ledger, 1 Star-Ledger Plaza, Newark, NJ
07102, or click here
to contact him through this web site.
|